醉后决定爱上你

【活力中国调研行】种地，换玩法了？_我的网站

A |     

    Latest news
China has firmly rejected and condemned a new annual report by the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service on Friday which once again fabricates and sensationalizes claims about so-called "Chinese interference" and "China threat," stressing that the report is rife with Cold War thinking and contains unfounded accusations against China.
This report is clearly linked to a series of recent negative developments in New Zealand's China-related policies, a Chinese expert told the Global Times on Friday. 
Recently, New Zealand has continuously toughened its rhetoric toward China, which to some extent reflects a form of "compensatory hawkishness" aimed at demonstrating its reliability within the Five Eyes alliance, Chen Hong, director of New Zealand Studies Centre, East China Normal University, told the Global Times. "Rather than reflecting 'strategic confidence,' this trend may reveal a sense of 'identity anxiety,'" Chen said. 
The New Zealand intelligence agency claimed in the report released on Thursday that China is the only nation pursuing espionage in New Zealand at scale, Radio New Zealand reported. It also claimed that such activity posed threat to New Zealand, which is the "most challenging of recent times."
Many of its unfounded accusations against China either maliciously label normal exchanges, communication and cooperation as so-called espionage or interference activities, or are simply baseless fabrications. China absolutely rejects and firmly opposes this, the Chinese Embassy in New Zealand said in a statement released on Friday. 
The release of this report at this time is part of a new round of attacks, smears and vilification of China orchestrated by certain international forces. In itself, the report may well be the result of foreign interference, the embassy said. 
In June, security agencies from the "Five Eyes" alliance issued a warning, claiming that Chinese spies used online job platforms to recruit people with access to sensitive information, according to a Reuters report.
For now, the annual report has further escalated its rhetoric, effectively creating a chain in which the Five Eyes' warnings and New Zealand's domestic threat assessments reinforce and echo each other, the Chinese expert said. 
The Lowy Institute said in a latest article on Thursday that New Zealand had long been considered the weakest link in Five Eyes and the easiest for China to try to cow. "But New Zealand has now called out China by name in its intelligence warnings so often that officials joke it has become tougher on Beijing than Australia is," the article said. 
The extent to which New Zealand's intelligence agencies have publicly singled out China has in fact gone further than Australia's, which, I think, represents a compensatory hardline posture, Chen noted. 
"New Zealand wants to demonstrate that it is a very active and very tough member of the Five Eyes. In fact, we have recently seen New Zealand take a high-profile stance on issues ranging from Pacific Island countries and China's relations with South Pacific and South China Sea nations to China's missile tests and other China-related issues. All of these developments can be viewed in the context of this policy shift," the expert said. 
This suggests that some forces within New Zealand's security and foreign policy establishment are consciously trying to demonstrate that New Zealand is not a weak link in the Five Eyes alliance, but rather an active participant, Chen added. 
The report also reflects the fact that some people both within and outside New Zealand do not want to see China-New Zealand relations develop positively. By going to great lengths to spread rumors, they seek to drive a wedge between the peoples of the two countries, create a chilling effect among the public, including overseas Chinese, undermine bilateral mutual trust, and obstruct the development of bilateral relations, the embassy noted. 
Their actions serve geopolitical purposes and the narrow, short-sighted political interests of certain forces. Their intentions are clear to anyone with insight, and their objectives will not succeed.
The embassy also noted that the essence of China-New Zealand relations is mutually beneficial cooperation and win-win outcomes. In recent years, with the joint efforts of both sides, bilateral relations have made steady progress. Bilateral trade has repeatedly reached new highs, bringing substantial income and employment opportunities to New Zealanders. 
People-to-people exchanges have continued to grow, with the numbers of tourists and international students increasing steadily, promoting mutual understanding and closer ties between the peoples of the two countries. The overseas Chinese community in New Zealand has played a unique and important positive role in this regard. 
Since China introduced a unilateral visa-free policy for New Zealand, many New Zealand tourists have visited China, witnessing firsthand China's development achievements and openness and inclusiveness, the embassy said. 
As a result of various factors, New Zealanders' understanding of China has become more comprehensive and objective in recent years, while favorable views of China and support for China-New Zealand relations have continued to rise
The embassy also warned those forces and individuals attempting to engage in political manipulation: Do not undermine the hard-won, mutually beneficial and win-win China-New Zealand relationship for your own selfish interests, thereby harming the interests of New Zealand and its people. 
Acting as pawns for anti-China forces internationally will ultimately prove counterproductive. Creating controversies in foreign relations will not solve New Zealand's problems; it will likely only make matters worse, the embassy said, urging these forces and individuals not to resort to desperate measures that will ultimately harm themselves, or lift a rock only to drop it on their own feet.
China attaches importance to its relations with New Zealand and is willing to work with the New Zealand side, on the basis of the consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries, to advance exchanges and cooperation in various fields, including political mutual trust, practical cooperation and people-to-people exchanges, and to better benefit the peoples of both countries, the embassy said. 
However, the development of China-New Zealand relations does not depend on China alone. We hope the New Zealand side will work in the same direction as China, rather than the opposite. Otherwise, the New Zealand side will bear responsibility for any consequences arising from such a course of action, it noted. 
。          　　央视网消息 高端农业拼的不只是技术，还有“能耗成本归零”      　　过去说起农业，脑子里就一句话：春种秋收，靠天吃饭。现在呢?大棚里能造出一年四季，技术早就不是问题了。

B |      　　真正的问题是：能种得起吗?      　　“种得起”这三个字，才是高端农业的命门。山东茌平有个信发农业园，就是冲着这三个字去的。     　　它的母公司信发集团，本身就是热电和铝电企业。

C | 工业的底子，给了农业降本的可能。     　　它干的事，是把工业和农业连在一起，让工业的“废”，变成农业的“宝”。农业最烧钱的几项——供暖、用肥、用电，它一项一项用工业的“废”来填。     　　先看供暖和用肥。     　　工业有三样头疼的东西：废热没处去，废气得花钱治，废料得找地儿倒。

D | 农业呢?正好缺三样：大棚要暖气，作物要二氧化碳，土地要肥料。     　　两张单子一对，事情就变了。工业余热进大棚，一年省标煤1.3万吨。

E | 废气里的二氧化碳捕集起来，送进大棚当养料，一年降碳近两万吨。养殖废弃物做成有机肥，回到地里接着用。

F |      　　表面看是做环保。实际上是把工业账本上的“支出”，挪到农业账上，变成了“收入”。工业觉得是麻烦，农业觉得是原材料。再看用电。     　　农业园里什么最多?屋顶、墙面、棚顶。过去这些地方，除了落灰，不产生任何价值。     　　信发把它们全铺上了光伏板。兔舍屋顶发电，一年3012万度，自用还有富余。冷库更干脆，屋顶铺满，外墙也不闲着。一年下来，冷库的电费账单变成了零元。     　　所以，它没有去解决“电费贵”这个问题。它让“电费”这件事，直接消失了。

G | 这在商业上，叫重构价值链，就是把成本拆开，往下一项一项算。     　　但是，光伏发电有个毛病：看天吃饭。太阳大了，电用不完;阴天了，电又不够。可农业用电，一天不能停。     　　怎么办?它建了一个微电网。发多了，存起来;发少了，补进来。

H | 这里全年发电6661万度，用电7000万度。

I | 绿电自给率，达到95%以上。

J |      　　这里的逻辑，不是“每一刻都够用”，而是“全年统筹下来够用”。单点再强，不如系统稳。而系统的秘密，不在于新，而在于连。     　　光伏板别人也有，余热利用不是新概念，二氧化碳施肥也不稀奇。

K | 它只是把这些散落的东西，放进一个系统里，让它们互相接住。

L |      　　你看，农业不只拼产量，还要拼成本。这个农业园，看起来是在搞循环农业，实际上就干了一件事：把成本里能降的，一项一项都降下来。成本压得足够低，利润才出得来。利润出得来，高端农业才不是一句空话。     　　高端农业的创新，未必是发明新东西，而是把旧元素放进新系统。当你打破产业的边界，就会发现：一个领域的累赘，恰好是另一个领域的解药。真正的能耗成本归零，从来不是在旧账本上死抠每一分钱，而是站在系统的顶层，把过去的废物，重新定义为今天的资产。     　　信发集团董事局主席 张学信：我现在是零排放，我把这个烟囱里的气，把二氧化碳提出来，又放到每个大棚里。养鱼的水，我把粪便处理出来，上樱桃。

M | 这个水里养鱼，我是来回循环着使。光电厂煤灰煤渣、脱硫石膏，一天废品废料都3万多吨。上农村搞大棚，我把这些废料都变成了宝。

Current article:http://6bx.cengzaodengchawonin.cyou/5lkhi7/um8yw.html

Published on:08:15:25